Neeley v. Barber
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
This is an effort by the appellant Neeley to avoid paying a filing fee for appealing to the circuit court from a misdemeanor conviction in the municipal court. We agree with the circuit judge’s ruling that a fee must be paid.
Neeley was convicted of a misdemeanor by the Pope County municipal court. When he tried to appeal to the circuit court, the circuit clerk demanded a filing fee. Neeley first sought a writ of mandamus to compel the clerk to accept the appeal without a filing fee. When that petition was resisted, Neeley, who does not assert indigency, paid the fee…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Wilson v. Pulaski Ass'n of Classroom TeachersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Dougan v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- LaFont v. MixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Carrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.