Legal Opinion

Neeley v. Barber

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1986No. 85-191PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is an effort by the appellant Neeley to avoid paying a filing fee for appealing to the circuit court from a misdemeanor conviction in the municipal court. We agree with the circuit judge’s ruling that a fee must be paid.

Neeley was convicted of a misdemeanor by the Pope County municipal court. When he tried to appeal to the circuit court, the circuit clerk demanded a filing fee. Neeley first sought a writ of mandamus to compel the clerk to accept the appeal without a filing fee. When that petition was resisted, Neeley, who does not assert indigency, paid the fee…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Pulaski Ass'n of Classroom TeachersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Dougan v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. LaFont v. MixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Carrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API