Legal Opinion

Seale v. American Motorist Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided October 18, 1990No. 09-89-100 CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Appeal from the granting of a summary judgment. The basic question involves the administration of medical expenses. TEX. REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. Art. 8306, sec. 6 (Vernon 1967) provides, in relevant part, that medical aid, hospital services, chiropractic services and medicines, as provided for in section 7 (Vernon 1967, Vernon Supp. 1990), shall be supplied as and when needed and according to the terms and provisions of said section 7. Section 7, entitled “Medical Services”, spells out, in relevant part, that the employee shall have the sole right to select or choose a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Delgado v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Greenhalgh v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hardin v. HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Luna v. North Star Dodge Sales, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hough v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Houston v. Christopher A. Rhule, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  3. City of Houston v. Christopher A. Rhule, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  4. Kuykendall v. Gulfstream Aerospace TechnologiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Kuykendall v. Gulfstream Aerospace TechnologiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API