Greenhalgh v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAUZY, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether a trial court abuses its discretion by allowing a post-verdict amendment increasing the amount of damages in Plaintiff’s pleadings to conform to the amount awarded by the jury when Defendant presents no evidence of surprise or prejudice. We hold that under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 63 arid 66, a trial court must allow a trial amendment that increases the amount of damages sought in the pleadings to that found by the jury unless the opposing party presents evidence of prejudice or surprise.
Plaintiff Greenhalgh and Service Lloyds…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Hardin v. HardinTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Vermillion v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Kelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1984
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Altus, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by292 opinions
- Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- State Bar of Texas v. KilpatrickTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Weidner v. Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- American Medical International, Inc. v. GiurintanoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. McKenzieTexas Supreme Court · 1999
287 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.