Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kuykendall v. Gulfstream Aerospace Technologies

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 2002No. 97,036Published

1Dissent

KAUGER, J.,

with whom Watt, V.C.J., Hodges and Boudreau, JJ. join, dissenting:

11 A single, first impression question of law is presented: whether a self-insured employer is shielded by the Workers' Compensation Act, 85 0.8.2001 § 1, et seq. from tort liability for the intentional, bad faith refusal to pay post-award benefits. Although I express no opinion on whether the facts in this cause would support such an award, I dissent from the majority's determination that the Workers' Compensation Act precludes recovery for the intentional, tortious, post-award acts of a self-insured employer. The…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. American Motorists Insurance Co. v. FodgeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. McCorkle v. Great Atlantic Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API