Legal Opinion

Jones v. MacKey Price Thompson & Ostler

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2015No. Case No. 20130135PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice DURRANT,

opinion of the Court:

Introduction

T1 This case arises out of a dispute over compensation paid to an attorney, Gregory Jones, by the law firm Mackey Price Thompson & Ostler (Mackey Price) for work Mr. Jones performed on several class-action contingency fee cases involving the weight-loss pill Fen-Phen. Mr. Jones worked on the Fen-Phen cases from 2002 to May 26, 2005, when he abruptly developed a mental disability called dissociative amnesia, which prevented him from remembering anything prior to that date. This disability also prevented him from continuing to work on the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. UMIA Insurance v. SaltzUtah Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Mitchell v. Wells Fargo BankDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2017
  3. Jones v. Mackey PriceUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Bloom Master Inc. v. Bloom Master LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  5. S6 v. Wing EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API