Jones v. MacKey Price Thompson & Ostler
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice DURRANT,
opinion of the Court:
Introduction
T1 This case arises out of a dispute over compensation paid to an attorney, Gregory Jones, by the law firm Mackey Price Thompson & Ostler (Mackey Price) for work Mr. Jones performed on several class-action contingency fee cases involving the weight-loss pill Fen-Phen. Mr. Jones worked on the Fen-Phen cases from 2002 to May 26, 2005, when he abruptly developed a mental disability called dissociative amnesia, which prevented him from remembering anything prior to that date. This disability also prevented him from continuing to work on the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- UMIA Insurance v. SaltzUtah Supreme Court · 2022
- Mitchell v. Wells Fargo BankDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2017
- Jones v. Mackey PriceUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- Bloom Master Inc. v. Bloom Master LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- S6 v. Wing EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.