Bogle & Gates, P.L.L.C. v. Holly Mountain Resources
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
The former law firm of Bogle & Gates, P.L.L.C., seeks to collect fees for legal services it performed for Holly Mountain Resources, an Idaho corporation. Because we conclude that the agreement to perform services was oral as to Holly Mountain Resources, we affirm the trial court’s conclusion that Bogle & Gates’ claim against the corporation was barred by the three-year limitations period.
FACT STATEMENT
In June 1993, John Zapel, David Zapel, and Holly Mountain Resources were named as defendants in an action filed by Peter Rees for trespass to timber. John Zapel, who is the president of Holly…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- DePhillips v. Zolt Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- DePhillips v. Zolt Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- New Meadows Holding Co. v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Johnson v. NasiWashington Supreme Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Flower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Bale v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Urban Development, Inc. v. Evergreen Building Products, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.