Legal Opinion

Ushman Ex Rel. Ushman v. Sterling Drug, Inc.

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided March 22, 1988No. 87-3289PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

A question of removal.

Specifically, the “voluntary-involuntary” rule.

It is a viable doctrine which is here applicable.

The case is remanded to state court.

This cause is before the Court on the recommendation of United States Magistrate Charles H. Evans. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has made a de novo review of the objections to the Magistrate’s recommendation filed herein.

The able recommendation will be adopted.

I. FACTS

On November 25, 1986, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants in state court seeking damages for injuries she…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Jerome R. Lewis v. Time IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Luther Weems v. Louis Dreyfus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. James Debry, Robert J. Debry and Lynn M. Hilton v. Transamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Vogel v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
  3. Arthur v. E.I. Du PontDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1992
  4. Todd Holding Co., Inc. v. Super Valu Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990
  5. Johnson v. Snapper Division of Fuqua Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API