Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Snapper Division of Fuqua Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided May 10, 1993No. 6:93cv30PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEGER, District Judge.
On this day came on to be considered the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. After careful consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the following order should issue.
I.' FACTS
This is a products liability case in which the plaintiffs (a husband and wife) allege that Ms. Johnson was severely injured while operating a riding mower manufactured by Snapper Division of Fuqua Industries (“Snapper”). Based upon that allegation, the plaintiffs bring claims based upon strict products liability, warranty, and gross negligence. The action was originally filed in the District…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Multibank, Inc. v. Access Global Capital LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2018
- Vogel v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- Miller v. FultonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2000
- F&M Bank v. SchemmingDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2024
- ROSARIO v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020