Legal Opinion

State v. Hilsman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1983No. Cr. 887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Defendant/Appellant, Gerald Hilsman, is appealing from a jury conviction of two counts of robbery and from a judgment entered in accordance therewith by the District Court of Ward County. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we affirm.

On appeal, Hilsman raises four issues. His primary argument is twofold and concerns the trial court’s evidentiary rulings. First, he attacks the trial court’s restriction of defense counsel’s cross-examination of the State’s chief witness, Aaron Stein. Secondly, he contends the trial court erred by precluding defense counsel from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. LenarchickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. SchulerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. MehralianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. OhnstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. KunkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. BibyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. PadgettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API