Legal Opinion
State v. McGee
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 15, 2017No. AC38771PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.
*568The defendant, Frank McGee, appeals following the trial court's dismissal of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly rejected his claim that the imposition of separate sentences upon him on two counts of robbery in the second degree, each prosecuted in connection with the robbery of a single victim, but under a different subdivision of the second degree robbery statute, General Statutes (Rev. to 2007) § 53a-135 (a), violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy. We are not persuaded.
The following factual background and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. ALVARO F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. BattleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State Marshal Assn. of Connecticut, Inc. v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.