Legal Opinion

People v. Dillingham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1969No. Gen. 68-186PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

This appeal questions the propriety of a conviction of the offense of driving while license suspended (111 Rev Stats 1967, c 95%, § 6-303) in DuPage County after a plea of guilty and judgment of conviction of the same charge in Kane County.

Defendant claims that the judgment below was in error because it constituted a successive trial for the same offense against the State within the bar of either the constitutional provision against double jeopardy (Ill Const, § 10, art 2) or a similar statutory provision of Ill Rev Stats 1967, c 38, 3-4 (a) (1) prohibiting a subsequent prosecution based on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. United States v. Midstate Horticultural Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. People v. JensenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. People v. StrodeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. State v. MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. People v. TateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Hallman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API