Legal Opinion

Razorcom Teleph & Net, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 7, 2003No. 03-450CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This post-award bid protest stems from a request for proposals initially issued by the United States Marine Corps on July 15,2002. The contract was eventually awarded to Nex-tira One Federal. Plaintiffs protest to the United States General Accounting Office (“GAO”) was denied as untimely. Plaintiff filed its complaint here on February 27, 2003.

Pending are the parties’ Rule 56.1 cross-motions for summary judgment on the administrative record. Oral argument was held on April 4,2003. The following order further explains the bench ruling issued on that date, granting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The United States, and at & T Communications, Inc. And Us Sprint Communications Company, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Laforge & Budd Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API