Legal Opinion

Bannum, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 10, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00429PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pre-Award Bid Protest; Supplementation of the Administrative Record Not Appropriate; Rational Rejection of Protestor’s Bid for Failure to Provide Valid Proof of Zoning; No Evidence of Disparate Treatment of Offerors.

OPINION AND ORDER

Bush, Senior Judge.

This pre-award bid protest arises out of Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 200-1198-SE, by which the United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), seeks to procure residential reentry center services (a halfway house and attendant services) for federal offenders in Columbia, South Carolina. Bannum, Inc. (Bannum) filed a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API