Legal Opinion

Barnes v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 10, 1992No. 01-91-01454-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MIRABAL, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Marcus Lemont Barnes, guilty of aggravated robbery. The jury assessed punishment at 35-years confinement and a fine of $8,000. We affirm.

In his first point of error, appellant asserts that there is insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction.

In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the judgment. Flournoy v. State, 668 S.W.2d 380, 383 (Tex.Crim.App.1984). The critical inquiry is whether, after viewing the entire body of evidence in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Flournoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Sutherlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Gomez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mann v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Escovedo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  3. McDuff v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. Gonzalo Artemio Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API