Legal Opinion

Boehck Construction Equipment Corp. v. Voigt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1962PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The following is a breakdown of the lien claims involved in this appeal, other than that of Hartford as assignee or subrogee of C. C. Linck and N. A. Elden:

Claimant Conceded as Disputed Total allowed

valid by by trial court

Hartford

Sweeney Bros., Inc. $1,275.00 — $ 1,125.16

W. H. Peter and C.

A. Porter, d/b/a

Fox Lake Oil Co. 3,946.04 3,946.04

C. A. Porter & Sons, Inc. $ 155.80 155.80

— 1,183.45 Paul Madigan 1,183.45

Paul Madigan, as as-signee of: Henry J.

Will 323.39 323.39

*67Beaver Ready Mix

(no motion to review) — $ 51.37 —

Reitan-Lerdahl & Co. (motion to review) — 1,778.27 $ 500.00

Hammersley…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bond v. HarrelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Punke v. BrodyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cowin & Co. v. City of MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lehmann Tire & Supply, Inc. v. Mashuda Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Smith v. Town of PershingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kablitz v. HoeftWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Kirchen v. OrthDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
  3. Peabody Seating Co. v. Jim Cullen, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Pavalon v. FishmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Matter of LemanskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API