Pavalon v. Fishman

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court had jurisdiction over the person of appellant. This question does not turn, as respondent asserts, on whether appellant may ultimately be held responsible in this action, 2 but rather is dependent on whether the requirements of sec. 262.05, Stats., are satisfied. Although respondent contends that the trial court had jurisdiction under either secs. 262.05 (3), 262.05 (4), or 262.05 (5) (e), 3 subs. (3) and (4) are expressly limited to actions involving “injury to person or property.” 4 Inasmuch as there has been no personal or…