Legal Opinion
Bugg v. Fancher, 06 Ca 12 (4-19-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 19, 2007No. 06 CA 12PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
{¶ 1} This case involves a boundary dispute between adjacent landowners. Kay Fancher contends the trial court's judgment in favor of Stuart and Donna Bugg is against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court relied upon the testimony presented by the Buggs' two surveyors and the previous owner of the tracts to establish the location of the boundary line. While Fancher presented some evidence that would support a different location, the trial court was free to choose which version of the facts it found to be more credible. Because the trial court's…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Allstate Financial Corp. v. Westfield Service Management Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Pettet v. PettetOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Owens v. HaunertOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by21 opinions
- Shumaker v. Hamilton Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re R.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Fitzpatrick v. PalmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Amsbary v. BrumfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re A.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.