Legal Opinion
Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Cotton
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided December 22, 1975No. Civ. A. C75-1807A, C75-1808APublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.
These are both actions brought by plaintiff to foreclose against defendant upon a mortgage because of defendant’s alleged failure to pay the indebtedness due on a promissory note. The defendant has petitioned for removal from the Superior Court for Gwinnett County and the plaintiff seeks to remand the cases because of this court’s lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. For the purpose of plaintiff’s motion to remand, the parties have consented to consolidate the two cases.
In order for these cases to be removed to federal court, defendant must demonstrate that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Harry Gibson v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Acron Investments, Inc. v. Federal Savings And Loan Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Thomas Wayne Milligan v. Laurie Ann MilliganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Gibson v. First Federal Savings and Loan AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Hoag Ranches, Debtor. Hoag Ranches v. Stockton Production Credit AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- DeLaigle v. Federal Land Bank of ColumbiaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1983
- Birbeck v. Southern New England Production Credit Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
- Crum v. Veterans of Foreign WarsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- South Central Iowa Production Credit Ass'n v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.