Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Moskowitz
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 2, 1996No. Civil Action 93-2028PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland (“F & D”). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, F & D moves for summary judgment on the claims brought against it by the Resolution Trust Corporation (the “RTC”), in its capacity as Receiver of United Savings Bank, F.S.B. (“United”). The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) succeeded to the RTC and opposes this motion. The Court decides this motion on the parties’ written submissions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Leroy D. Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation and Industrial Valley Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Alvaro Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc. And Playskool Baby, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liebling v. Garden State Indem.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Jasmine, Ltd. (In Re Jasmine, Ltd.)District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. DillerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Great American Insurance v. Subranni (In Re Tri-State Armored Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Pereira v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (In Re Payroll Express Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.