Legal Opinion
Laminex, Inc. v. Fritz
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 13, 1974No. 73 C 1554PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JULIUS J. HOFFMAN, Senior District Judge.
This is presently an action for patent infringement in which the defendants counterclaim for declaratory judgments of noninfringement, patent invalidity and unenforeeability.
Previously the suit was more complex: plaintiff asserted claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition and deceptive trade practices; defendants counterclaimed for alleged violations of the antitrust laws. These issues, however, have been resolved. 1
By way of assignment, Laminex, Inc. is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the two…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moleculon Research Corporation v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Freeman v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Standun, Inc. v. Polycraft Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976