Legal Opinion

Pereyda v. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1971No. Civ. 12556PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAY, J. *

Defendant-appellant State Personnel Board appeals from that portion of an amended judgment granting a writ of mandate ordering the “Board” to vacate its dismissal of plaintiff-appellant Pereyda and to restore him to his employment as a correctional officer. Pereyda appeals from that portion of said amended judgment denying his request for back pay.

Question Presented

Is the mere presence and possession of empty alcoholic containers, with no trace of alcoholic beverages, in view of Pereyda’s explanation of their presence, sufficient to justify the hearing officer’s finding that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. DraperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Martin v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. California Youth Authority v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Ettinger v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Wilson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API