Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1997)

California Attorney General Reports

Decided February 26, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General CLAYTON P. ROCHE Deputy Attorney General

THE HONORABLE SCOTT WILDMAN, MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following question:

May two city firefighters who have developed a firefighting protective device sell the device to the city's fire department without violating the "self-dealing" contractual prohibition of Government Code section1090?

CONCLUSION

Two city firefighters who have developed a firefighting protective device may sell the device to the city's fire department without violating the "self-dealing" contractual…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API