Thomas v. Stenberg
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DONDERO, J.
Plaintiff Nelson Thomas appeals from the judgment of nonsuit after the trial court entered its order granting the motion of defendants Erland L. Stenberg, Maryann Stenberg, and E Lazy S Land and Livestock, Inc. (collectively referred to herein as defendants), for nonsuit. Plaintiff claims the court erred in concluding defendants did not have a legal duty to take measures to protect him from the harm that occurred when the motorcycle upon which he was riding collided with a cow on a private road passing through defendants’ property. We affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Kimberly Marroquin v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- (PC) Gelazela v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Kohut v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.