Legal Opinion

Bullard v. Life & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1934No. 9873PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gilbert, J\

A policy of life insurance is a contract. Civil Code (1910), § 2496. The cardinal rule for the construction of the contract is to ascertain the intention of the parties. § 4266. In arriving at the true interpretation of a contract, words usually bear their “usual and common signification.” In common parlance, or according to usual signification of the word, an “automobile” is not a “motorcycle.” Both are “motor-driven” vehicles, but not all “motor-driven” vehicles are “automobiles” nor are all “motorcycles.” Had it been the intention of the parties that the insurance should cover…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jernigan v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Texas Casualty Insurance Company v. WybleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Le Croy v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Loftus v. Pennsylvania Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API