Bullard v. Life & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Gilbert, J\
A policy of life insurance is a contract. Civil Code (1910), § 2496. The cardinal rule for the construction of the contract is to ascertain the intention of the parties. § 4266. In arriving at the true interpretation of a contract, words usually bear their “usual and common signification.” In common parlance, or according to usual signification of the word, an “automobile” is not a “motorcycle.” Both are “motor-driven” vehicles, but not all “motor-driven” vehicles are “automobiles” nor are all “motorcycles.” Had it been the intention of the parties that the insurance should cover…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Jernigan v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Texas Casualty Insurance Company v. WybleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Le Croy v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Loftus v. Pennsylvania Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.