Legal Opinion
Texas Casualty Insurance Company v. Wyble
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 9, 1960No. 13574PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Plaintiff, Charles Wyble, recovered $1,-000.00 damages under a Family Automobile Policy issued by defendant, Texas Casualty Insurance Company. Plaintiff’s son, while riding a motor scooter was struck by an automobile. The only point in the case is the meaning of the exclusionary clause of the policy relied upon by insurer.
Plaintiff claimed under the policy provision which obligated insurer to pay all reasonable medical expenses 1 caused by being struck by an automobile. 2 Insurer admits that plaintiff’s son was struck by an automobile, but denies liability under this policy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Deardorff, Admr. v. Cont. L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Neighbors v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of TennesseeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Bullard v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. KingAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Members Mutual Insurance Company v. RandolphCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Loftus v. Pennsylvania Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Wilshire Ins. Co. v. Transit Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Futrell v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Navarra v. Central National Insurance Co. of OmahaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.