Legal Opinion

Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1949No. 6 Div. 831PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

This appeal presents the question of whether a motorcycle is included in the coverage of a policy of insurance against theft issued by appellant, the insurer, to the appellee, who was a used car dealer.

The form of the policy was an “Automobile Dealers’ Open Policy Monthly Reporting Form,” which designated no specific type of vehicle. The specified coverage is embodied in Section 1 of the insuring clause and Article 10 of the conditions.

Section 1 provides: “The Policy designated below covers automobiles owned by the insured and held for sale or used in repair service, or as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moore v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Laporte v. North American Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Koser v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Deardorff, Admr. v. Cont. L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Colyer v. North American Accident InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Trans-Continental Mutual Insurance Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. BudigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Canal Insurance Company v. StidhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. National Casualty Company v. ThompsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Riggs v. RiggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API