Legal Opinion

Psi Energy, Inc. And Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 10, 2005No. 04-5079PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

PSI Energy, Inc. and Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. (together “the appellants”) appeal the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, holding them liable for tax levied on users of enriched uranium for generation of nuclear power, although the appellants did not use the enriched uranium or produce nuclear power.1 We conclude that the tax was improperly levied on the appellants, and reverse the decision of the Court of Federal Claims.

BACKGROUND

A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth Edison Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Yankee Atomic Electric Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Union Electric Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. PSI Energy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Boye v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Starr International Company, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Blueport Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Psi Energy, Inc. And Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API