Legal Opinion
Mayhew v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 21, 2011No. Case No. 11-2908 SCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MAYHEW’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Melinda Mayhew (“Mayhew”) commenced this action for declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief pursuant to § 502(a)(1) of the Employee Retirement Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1), against Defendants Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”) and Formfactor, Inc. Group Welfare Benefit Plan (collectively, “Defendants”). ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 1. In answering the Complaint, Hartford asserted a Counterclaim for restitution. ECF No. 16 (“Counterclaim”) ¶¶ 67-72.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schultz v. Aviall, Inc. Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health PlanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Trustees of Plumbers v. RossmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020