Legal Opinion

Multnomah County v. Hammond Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1935No. 7857PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

The steamship liureka, owned by appellee Hammond Lumber Company, was damaged at Portland, Or., in a collision with the east leaf of the “Burnside Bridge,” a drawbridge over the Willamette river, a navigable stream. The bridge is owned and operated by the appellant, Multnomah county, Or., a municipal corporation and body politic. It is of the bascule type operated electrically. There are 'two spans known as the east and west spans, and when both are open the clearance is 205 feet. Upon proper signal, properly answered, the bridge tender started to open the draw to allow…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clement v. Metropolitan West Side El. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  2. Dahlmer v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
  3. Munroe v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  4. Fay v. Compagnia Générale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  5. The CananovaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. SS Marie LeonhardtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. City of Cleveland v. McIverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  3. Kim Reuter v. Bob SkipperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Nassau County Bridge Authority v. Tug Dorothy McAllisterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962
  5. Charles D. Stuart v. Will Wilson, Attorney General of the State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API