Friedman v. L. M. Beck & Galilee Fish Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
The principal questions presented are (1) whether the question of contributory negligence, if any, of the plaintiff Beatrice Friedman, is involved; (2) if so, whether the evidence justified a finding against her on this issue; and (3) whether under the facts and circumstances of this case her husband, the plaintiff Jacob Friedman, had a cause of action for medical expenses, loss of consortium and services.
We are of the opinion that the evidence was sufficient to justify a finding that the plaintiff wife (hereinafter called plaintiff) had been rendered ill by consuming lobster pin-chased by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Abounader v. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Joan S. Neff, Administratrix of the Estate of John W. Neff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Meyer v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1978
- Pioneer Construction Company v. BergeronSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.