Legal Opinion

Barbano v. Central-Hudson Steamboat Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 12, 1931No. 152PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

Central-Hudson Steamboat Company, a New York corporation, in 1899 executed a first mortgage upon all its property to secure 500 5 per cent, bearer bonds of $1,000 each, maturing May 1,1919. For convenience, this will be referred to as the first mortgage. In 1913 the steamboat company executed another mortgage upon all its property, also designated as a “first mortgage,” although expressly made subject to the lien of the 1899 mortgage. The 1913 mortgage will hereinafter be called the refunding mortgage. The refunding mortgage was to secure 750 5 per cent, bearer bonds of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Atlantic Delaine Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. IsacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Kraft v. HolzmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. New York Security & Trust Co. v. Louisville, E. & St. L. Consol. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Franklin Financial v. New Empire Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Shane v. WINTER HILL FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'NMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Guleserian v. FieldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  4. 100 Eighth Ave. Corp. v. MorgensternNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Empire State Collateral Co. v. Bay Realty CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API