Legal Opinion
100 Eighth Ave. Corp. v. Morgenstern
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1956PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. Henry Martuscello, J.
This is an action to foreclose a second mortgage made by defendant Mortimer Danzer to the plaintiff herein, dated November 15, 1951. In November, 1953 co-ordinating interests in and to said mortgage and the bond which it secured, were assigned to the defendants John Bichler and Milton M. Eisenberg, so that said defendants and the plaintiff are the joint owners thereof.
The complaint alleges in substance that the defendants have defaulted under the terms and conditions of the second mortgage and the bond secured thereby by reason of the failure of the defendants to pay installments of principal…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Germania Life Insurance v. PotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Domus Realty Corp. v. 3440 Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1943
- Campbell v. MacombNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
- Domus Realty Corp. v. 3440 Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Lowenfeld v. WimpleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shultis v. Woodstock Land Development AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Skaneateles Savings Bank v. HeroldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- 100 Eighth Avenue Corp. v. MorgensternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Shane v. WINTER HILL FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'NMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Brayton v. PappasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.