Vortex v. denkewicz/engelhard
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 Ray and Carol Ann Denkewicz and Rolf and Linda Engelhard (collectively “Appellants”) appeal portions of the judgment entered against them in favor of The Vortex Corporation (“Vortex”), Cody and Margaret Ramsey, and Ted and Sherene Lamb (collectively “Appellees”). For the following reasons, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Vortex was formed in 1993 by Appellant Rolf Engelhard. As an inventor in the area of water purification technology, Engel-hard envisioned Vortex as the corporate vehicle by which he could both generate income and fund his projects. Appellees Lamb and Ramsey…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le BeauSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cramton v. Grabbagreen Franchising LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Encon Arizona LLC v. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Gipson v. ShinnickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- Gipson v. ShinninkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- Johnson v. SwingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.