Berry's on Main, Inc. v. City of Columbia
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice:
Berry’s On Main, Inc. appeals the sustaining of a demurrer to its complaint alleging an unconstitutional taking of property by respondent City of Columbia without compensation. We reverse.
The court below held the complaint deficient for failure to allege two of the necessary elements of an unconstitutional taking. Those found lacking are, first, that there must be an affirmative, positive, aggressive act on the part of the governmental agency, Kline v. City of Columbia, 249 S. C. 532, 155 S. E. (2d) 597 (1967); and second, that the taking must have some degree of permanence,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Edens v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Webb v. Greenwood CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Collins v. CITY OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- Kline v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Byrd v. City of HartsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Hawkins v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- WRB Ltd. Partnership v. County of LexingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Rolandi v. City of SpartanburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Funderburk v. South Carolina Electric & Gas CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.