Legal Opinion

Locke v. Department of Treasury

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided September 14, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00163Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JEREMY A. LOCKE PLAINTIFF VS. 3:21-CV-00163-BRW DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE DEFENDANTS ORDER Pending is Plaintiff Jeremy A. Locke’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 1). Locke’s motion is GRANTED. Now, I must screen the complaint.1 “A pro se plaintiff must set forth enough factual allegations to ‘nudge their claims across the line from conceivable to plausible,’ or ‘their complaint must be dismissed’ for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”2 A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Martin v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Illinois Lumber & Material Dealers Ass'n Health Insurance Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API