Legal Opinion

Richard Bankston, D/b/a Aarohn Construction v. Pierce County, Wa

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 21, 2013No. 42850-4Published

1Opinion of the Court

ILED CUUET OF APPEALS DIVIS110IN' IL IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WAS DIVISION II UT Y RICHARD BANKSTON, d/ a AAROHN b/ No. 42850 4 II - - CONSTRUCTION, Appellant, V. PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PUBLISHED OPINION WORSWICK, C. . — sole proprietorship is not a legal entity separate from its owner. In J A this contract dispute, Richard Bankston d ba Aarohn Construction appeals summary judgment / / dismissing his suit against Pierce County. He argues that an entity named Aarohn Construction submitted a successful bid and entered into a contract with Pierce County. Holding that any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of HammackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Helgeson v. City of MarysvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. Public Employees Mutual Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. Dolby v. WorthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Evans v. LusterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API