Legal Opinion
Dolby v. Worthy
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 27, 2007No. 25784-3-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKulik, J.
¶1 Diana and Loren Michael Dolby filed a lawsuit against Walter and Karen Worthy, doing business as Worthy Enterprises. The Dolbys attempted to effect service by serving Crystal Pagel, an administrative office assistant at Worthy Enterprises. The court granted the Worthys’ motion to dismiss for lack of proper service of process within the statutory time period. The Worthys do business as a sole proprietorship, not a corporation. Accordingly, the Dolbys must serve them personally or at their home. We, therefore, affirm the trial court.
*815FACTS
¶2 Walter Worthy operates Worthy Enterprises as a sole…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- French v. GabrielWashington Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geneva College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Bankston v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Amana Global Company v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Gamez v. Greystar Real Estate Partners LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
- Red Letter Ministries, App/cross-resp v. City Of North Bend, Resp/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.