Legal Opinion

Moutos v. San Saba County Peanut Growers Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 19, 1954No. 10229PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Justice.

Appellee sued appellant on a sworn account, for interest and an attorneys’ fee. Appellant answered by special exceptions, a general denial and special pleas that there was absent a necessary party defendant; that the cause of action was barred by the two year statute of limitation, and that no recovery could be had on the cause of action alleged because of the statute of frauds, Art. 3995, Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St.

The evidence shows that appellant owns a farm in San Saba County near the town of Richland Springs; that he had pecan trees, hogs and other livestock on the farm and that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chastain v. Cooper & ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Gateley v. HumphreyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. BickhamTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Davenport v. Harry Payne Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Shahan-Taylor Co. v. Foremost Dairies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Texas Gas Corporation v. HankamerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Long Trusts v. Griffin, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  3. Lanpar Company v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Loomis Construction Company v. MatijevichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Seay v. Diversified, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API