Loomis Construction Company v. Matijevich
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
TUNKS, Justice.
This is a suit on a sworn account. The defendant in the trial court, appellant here, pleaded the two-year statute of limitations as a defense. The plaintiff, appellee here, by supplemental petition, alleged that because of facts hereinafter set out, the defendant was estopped to assert the defense of limitations. The trial was to the court without a jury. The defendant admitted that the materials and services which were the subject matter of the account were received and that the charges were reasonable. The evidence showed as a matter of law that the plaintiff’s petition was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Fort Worth v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- H. B. Zachry Co. v. Ceco Steel Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Grimes v. RobitailleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Moutos v. San Saba County Peanut Growers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Lee v. Universal Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Lesikar, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Gibson v. John D. Campbell and Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Lanpar Company v. StanfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- City of San Antonio v. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 624Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Reliance Electric & Engineering Co. v. Carrier-Houston Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.