Legal Opinion
Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Bickham
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1941No. 7708PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alexander
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals will be found in 136 S. W. (2d) 880.
While counsel for the widow and minor children of the deceased employee was examining the jury panel on voir dvre, he made the following statement:
“This suit was brought by Federal Underwriters Exchange to set aside an award made by the Industrial Accident Board and it is tried ‘de novo’ in this Court and the burden of proof is upon the claimants to prove the things necessary to entitle them to recover, regardless of what it is, just to show that they were entitled to recover.”
T…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- City of Pampa v. ToddTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Kelley v. FainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Federal Underwriters Exchange v. BickhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. ThurmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. LogsdonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Outlaw v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Darling v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Sisk v. Glens Falls Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.