Legal Opinion

Belknap Glass Co. v. Brown

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1912No. 10434PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered January IS, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a lien for labor and material furnished in the construction of a building for the defendants. The defense was that the plaintiff had not performed the contract. Defendants asked for damages on that account. The trial court found that the contract had been substantially performed, but deducted $30 from the contract price on account of two plates of glass which were conceded to be defective, and entered a decree foreclosing a lien for $432, with interest and costs, and also.$50 attorney’s fee, for the plaintiff. The defendants have appealed, and argue…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sumpter v. BurnhamWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Martin v. Kennecott Copper Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1918
  3. Patrick v. BonthiusWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Barber v. Grand Summitt Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API