Becker v. Schwerdtle
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
LORIGAN, J.—
The lower court sustained a demurrer to the second amended complaint in the above action, without leave to amend. A judgment of dismissal was thereupon entered, and plaintiff appeals.
The action was brought to have a trust declared as to certain real property, and to compel a conveyance.
The complaint sets forth that plaintiff and defendant are mother and son, the former aged sixty years, the latter thirty-six; that the most confidential relations always existed between them, plaintiff reposing the greatest confidence in her said son, advising with him in all her business affairs,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Soberanes v. SoberanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Newman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Nordholt v. NordholtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Taylor v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Cooper v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Berkey v. HalmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.