Legal Opinion

Becker v. Schwerdtle

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1903No. Sac. No. 1001PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

LORIGAN, J.—

The lower court sustained a demurrer to the second amended complaint in the above action, without leave to amend. A judgment of dismissal was thereupon entered, and plaintiff appeals.

The action was brought to have a trust declared as to certain real property, and to compel a conveyance.

The complaint sets forth that plaintiff and defendant are mother and son, the former aged sixty years, the latter thirty-six; that the most confidential relations always existed between them, plaintiff reposing the greatest confidence in her said son, advising with him in all her business affairs,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Soberanes v. SoberanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Newman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Nordholt v. NordholtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Taylor v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cooper v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Berkey v. HalmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API