Legal Opinion

Zelkowitz v. Tobin

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1951No. Civ. 18593PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Defendant, desirous of selling certain acreage, entered into a listing agreement with plaintiff, a real estate broker, on September 2, 1947, granting the latter 90 days within which to make a sale. It was provided that plaintiff should receive a commission of 5 per cent of the selling price “if a sale or exchange is effected by him” during the period of the agency. Upon receipt of the listing agreement, plaintiff commenced negotiations with one Dale E. Turner with a view of inducing him to purchase the Tobin acres and accompanied Turner to defendant Tobin’s home. Several interviews occurred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. McRae v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Neiswender v. E. B. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Lichtig & Rothwell, Inc. v. HolubarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H.S. Crocker Co., Inc. v. McFaddinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. In Re Eastview Estates Ii, Debtor. Perry T. Christison, Trustee for Eastview Estates II v. The Norm Ross Company and Eli Perlman Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API