Haun v. King
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKS, Judge.
The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the contractual doctrine of “frustration of commercial purpose”, recognized by the Supreme Court in North American Capital Corporation v. McCants, 510 S.W.2d 901 (Tenn.1974), is applicable to the facts of this case. The chancellor, invoking the doctrine, refused to enforce the contract and plaintiff has appealed. 1
Plaintiff was a principal in Haun Pontiac-Cadillac-GMC Corporation, which operated an automotive dealership in Athens, Tennessee. In February, 1980, the corporation petitioned for bankruptcy. Subsequently,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- In re Estate of FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Collins v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- LILLIAN PEBBLES MORRISON v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., MARK F. SHANKLE, SR. v. PEP BOYS — MANNY, MOE & JACK, INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Seawright v. American General Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Taylor v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. McKinnon Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Owens v. National Health Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.