Marfork Coal Co. v. Smith
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
R. CLARKE VANDERVORT, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending are Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Relevant Deposition Testimony (Document No. 166.) and Defendants’ Cross-Motion to Preclude Irrelevant Deposition Questioning and for Protective Order (Document No. 167.). Having considered the parties’ Motions and determined that the information which Plaintiff would compel Defendants to provide is not relevant to the parties’ claims and defenses and in any event may not be compelled in view of Defendants’ First and Fifth Amendment rights, the Court will deny Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- AFT Michigan v. Project VeritasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Blankenship v. Fox News Network, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2020
- Blankenship v. Fox News Network, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2020
- Hicks v. Houston Baptist UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2020