Legal Opinion

Protzman v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1942No. 35,427PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This is an appeal by a garnishee defendant from a judgment rendered against it and in favor of the principal defendant and the plaintiff in the garnishment action.

*241Before we can reach the merits of the appeal we are confronted with two motions of the plaintiff, appellee, to dismiss the appeal. The first motion is based upon the failure of appellant to abstract the record in conformity with the rules of this court. It is urged important testimony which supports the judgment is not abstracted. There is much to be said in support of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Biby v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Peoples State Bank v. Hoisington Cooperative Mercantile Manufacturing Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. White v. Central Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Lebanon State Bank ex rel. Johnson v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Habegger v. SkallaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. In Re Estate of WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Grant v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Cochran v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. State v. HanesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API