Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Finnell
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 6, 1986No. B010443PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINERMAN, P. J.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the third party claim of appellant, James J. Marin, to an automobile.
Background
On July 18, 1981, the judgment debtor, Paul Harwood Finnell, married Teri Lynn Bays Finnell. A few months later, the parties separated. On November 4, 1982, Mrs. Finnell filed an amended petition for dissolution of marriage and was granted attorney’s fees of $1,980.70. Shortly thereafter, a final judgment of dissolution was entered.
On July 15, 1983, Mr. Finnell sold appellant a BMW automobile for cash. Appellant was given a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Security Pacific National Bank v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Kenny v. ChristiansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Meritplan Ins. Co. v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. DearingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Green v. Roberts (In Re Stinson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- California State Automobile Assn. v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993