Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. McKenzie
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
Introduction
The primary issue raised on this appeal is one of insurance coverage. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Liberty) issued two policies to Michael McKenzie (McKenzie). Each required that the insured own the covered vehicle. Neither policy defined “owned.” McKenzie submitted claims on each policy based upon the theft of his truck. It is undisputed that the stolen vehicle was designated as the insured vehicle and that McKenzie had paid the policies’ premiums. It is also undisputed that Liberty subsequently learned that a month before the theft, McKenzie…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Unilogic, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Mid-Century Insurance v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Government Employees Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Austero v. National Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Bohannon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas Banks v. Hathaway, Perrett, Webster, Power & ChrismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Swiderski v. MILBERG WEISSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- United States v. WalkerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2009
- Jihan, Inc. v. Amco Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Yacullo v. AIG Property Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024