Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 10, 1986No. D004652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, Acting P. J.

Attorney Allen Bloom seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent his contempt trial. For the reasons set forth below we issue the writ.

On January 22, 1986, Bloom was conducting jury voir dire during a hearing under Penal Code section 1368 regarding his client’s competence to stand trial. Bloom asked a prospective juror the type of criminal case on which the juror had previously sat. The trial court ruled the question was improper and directed Bloom to “move to a different area” of inquiry. Bloom failed to comply with the court’s order. After making several requests of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Cooper v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Gallagher v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. United Nuclear Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Raiden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCann v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Boysaw v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re BaroldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. In Re KreitmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API