Legal Opinion
DirecTV, Inc. v. Benson
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided August 18, 2004No. 1:06-m-00069PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BEATY, District Judge.
On June 24, 2004, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties and a copy was given to the court.
Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation.
The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DirecTV, Inc. v. HartDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Doe v. Indiana Wesleyan UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
- Global Locating Systems LLC v. ShadowTrack 247, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
- MC1 Healthcare LLC v. Mountainside Solutions, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020